Resizing Your Antenna for Another Band

-part 3-

In the previous part, we talked about vertical antenna for 15 m band, while in the first part, we talked about 40 m band. Not so consistent isn’t it ? Well, let’s convert our 15 m band vertical antenna for 40 m band operation.

Actually, converting/resizing an antenna for another band is pretty straightforward, especially if the band of interest is not so far away from the previous band (relatively speaking). In fact, if we have some antenna size which is intended for 160 m band, we can easily resize it into the proper size for 10 m band, without many corrections afterward. To resize our antenna for another band, we rely on a fact that is the size of the antenna elements is linearly proportional to the wavelength. Which means that if we have an antenna element that is, let say, a quarter wavelength long, the new length for another frequency must be a quarter wavelength long as well (new frequency wavelength). It is so basic that I believe you already do know about it, but you will be surprised that how much amateur radio who don’t.

The paragraph above actually can be simplified into one formula as follows :

new_size = old_size x (old_freq / new_freq)

That’s it. Well, actually not. The proper formula is as follows :

new_size = old_size x (old_freq / new_freq) x corr_factor

With corr_factor is a correction factor, which largely depends on how much logarithmic distance between new and old frequency. For now, let assume that corr_factor is 1. This formula is can be applied and must be applied to everything. If you resize the vertical radiator element then you have to do it for radials as well, as well as your wire size, the height above the ground, the size of alu. tube you are using (if you are building a rotary dipole, for example), the elements spacing (in the array antenna case), even your boom size, everything ! In many cases, you cannot resize the diameter of wire or tube you are using. In that case, corr_factor comes into the calculation, but practically it is still very close to 1.

I’ve been using this technique last year when I built my 1 element diamond loop antenna for 15 m band. At that time, first I simulate and built diamond loop for 4 m band (to verify the dielectric constant/material of the wire insulation I’ve been using, turns out it was soft PVC), I optimized it for soft PVC material and then I resize it for 15 m band as accurately as possible. The first time I built it for 15 m band, it was perfectly matched exactly at the frequency that I wanted (it was 21,05 MHz for CW / Digital operations). No tuning required. At the first night, I even got a nice EU pileup with it on CW.

Some Examples

Now we will try to resize/calculate the proper size of the 15 m band vertical antenna above seawater (last article) into other bands, 160 m to 10 m. Let’s recall our last antenna dimensions.

Screenshot from 2017-11-09 03-36-37

We will use some notations as follows :

A = vertical radiator length = 3,9 m
R = radials length = 2,34 m
H = height above ground (seawater) = 1 m
D = wire dimensions = 1,6 mm dia. copper, 3,8 mm dia. soft PVC insulation.

new_size = old_size x (old_freq / new_freq) x corr_factor

With some simple calculations on a spreadsheet, we get new antenna dimensions as follows :

Screenshot from 2017-11-14 16-06-30

Then under 4NEC2, we can predict the VSWR value of the new antenna dimensions on each band. The results are as follows :

Screenshot from 2017-11-14 16-25-02

Wow, the new antenna dimensions on each band virtually have identical VSWR value as reference antenna has. Then it’s done, right ? Well, no. Actually, we have some problems here. First, we have some unpractical wire size (D) for the antenna element due to resizing of the D dimension into the new frequency. Second, the height of the vertical antenna base above ground level (H) is uncomfortably high for practical purpose. You can see on the first table that H dimension for 160 m, 80 m, and 40 m is too high. This is due to resizing of H dimension into the new frequency. The two problems above shown in the highlighted table below :

Screenshot from 2017-11-14 16-41-00

To attack these problems, we can set the physical limitations into our design and use various corr_factor to resize our dimensions on each band. In this article, we set the physical limitation of H is 2 meters maximum (2.08 m value for 30 m band is close enough so we don’t bother to recalculate this) and same wire dimension D for all band. Next, we can optimize the required corr_factor for each band using optimization tool in 4NEC2.

Screenshot from 2017-11-14 17-23-30

As it turns out, after we recalculate the proper size of each element for each band and applied the correction factors needed due to physical limitations we set before, it is still very close to the initial dimensions. Very nice !


A method for resizing antenna dimensions from one band to another is presented. Due to physical limitation, sometimes we can’t resize all dimensions properly, hence we need to apply correction factor into calculations. The results are the correction factors value is very close to 1 at the entire HF band and the final dimensions are still very close to the initial.

part 1

part 2

part 4


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s